- Subject: Re: Re: __FILE__ and path_rel
- From: "Klaus Schmid" <klaus.schmid@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:01:11 +0100
Guenter Milde wrote on Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:49 AM
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:22:57 +0100 wrote Klaus Schmid
<klaus.schmid@xxxxxx>:
> in the help text for expand_filename it reads
...
> i.e. it works the desired way only under Unix
Apart the examples I suppose expand_filename works as expected in
other systems: any valid file specification (e.g. "~/a" or "[-]a")
will be expanded to a normal one, according the rules of the current
system of course.
> > The intention for path_rel is to handle a system-independant relative
file
> > specification (e.g. "a/b/c") of any arbitrary length in a painless way.
>
> I.e. to translate a "Unix-convention" filename to the underlying
> systems one?
No. The superseded intention is to take advantage of organizing files
within a directory tree and to use this structure for addressing files
without assuming too much about this structure --> use relative file
specifications. Do it system-independent and painless --> path_rel.
Are you in doubt about the applications of path_rel?
Should I describe more examples in more detail?
Klaus
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2003 date index]
[2003 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]