- Subject: Re: wbf -- window/buffer/file functions
- From: "Klaus Schmid" <klaus.schmid@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:19:29 +0200
Dave Kuhlman wrote:
...
> Oh. Maybe their *order* is wrong.
>
> OK. So, then I'm going to suggest to Klaus that reverse the order
> of concatenating directory and file name (use "d+b" instead of
> "b+d"). Here is the change:
>
> --- ffx_old.sl 2003-08-07 08:33:50.000000000 -0700
> +++ ffx.sl 2003-08-07 13:42:46.000000000 -0700
> @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
> (b,d,,)= getbuf_info( whatbuf());
> if ( b != "")
> {
> - ()= write_buffer( b+d);
> + ()= write_buffer(d + b);
> return;
> }
> w= "write_buffer";
Argh! I looked at it and did not see it!
Sorry and thanks. All other occurances of
getbuf_info seem to be ok.
The current upload is already corrected.
> That works. But, I don't know why this was not a problem for
> Klaus.
Seems mysterious -- but I remember a discussion about automatic
corrections, something like a/b//c/d --> /c/d . Maybe this is related to
this?
For sure I have:
()= write_buffer( "testC:\\ks\\")
==
()= write_buffer( "C:\\ks\\test")
-- Klaus
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2003 date index]
[2003 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]