- Subject: Re: Namespaces for modes?
- From: Günter Milde <milde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:58:02 +0200
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 05:09:45PM +0200, Paul Boekholt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:47:03AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Functions that are only used by the same mode or derived modes can be in the
> > named namespace (although I sometimes use mode_* even there, for clarity
> > within the mode.sl file).
> > This also works for functions to be bound to the modes keymap or menu entries
> > with e.g.
> > definekey("mode->fun", Key_F11);
> The next version of cal.sl will have a function mark_diary_entries() that
> will highlight dates for which you have diary entries. Users may want their
> appointments highlighted on starting the calendar with some lines in their
> .jedrc:
>
> autoload("mark_diary_entries", "cal");
> define calendar_mode_hook()
> {
> mark_diary_entries();
> }
>
> If mark_diary_entries() were static this wouldn't be possible - you would
> have to require("cal") which is 600 lines.
I have to admit, that named namespaces have some drawbacks too... I use
them for functions I don't want the average user to access directly.
However, you could define a custom variable like Cal_Mark_Diary_Entries
and the user puts
variable Cal_Mark_Diary_Entries = 1;
into her .jedrc...
Günter
--
Milde at ife.et.tu-dresden.de
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2003 date index]
[2003 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]