Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Fri 15. Apr, 17:30 (+0200) : > * G. Milde <g.milde@xxxxxx> [2005-04-15 17:21]: > > > On 8.04.05, Paul Boekholt wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:21:51 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > > > > > > > > They have been uploaded to the experimental distribution. Notice that > > > > they depend on the libslang2 package, which is not yet in sid. > > > JED 0.99-17 should still compile with slang 1. > > > > Still, a binary package compiled with slang2 will need slang2, I suppose. > > > > An additional jed-99-17-slang1 package would be nice, though (but I do not > > know whether it is really needed). > > slang2 is not yet in Debian. We might generate a 0.99.17 package built > against slang1, but I am not sure it is a good idea creating parallel > packages with versioned names. This adds too much confusion for the user. I think so, too. > A related question: is the last release in the 0.99.17 development series > stable enough such that we could simply upload it to unstable, replacing > 0.99.16? Do we need to do so or can we wait for slang2? IIRC John said he want to release it this or next weekend. -- Diskutiere nie mit einem Idioten: Sie ziehen Dich auf ihr Niveau herab und schlagen Dich dann mit Erfahrung.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature