- Subject: RE: WJed key bindings and utf-8
- From: SANGOI DINO <SANGOID@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:27:12 +0200
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John E. Davis
> Sent: mercoledì 27 aprile 2005 8.13
> Subject: Re: WJed key bindings and utf-8
>
> SANGOI DINO <SANGOID@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >now another thing: I did an iconv module. I tried it under
> > slsh, and
> >for some small tests seems to work.
>
> I think that iconv is the way to go. A general purpose iconv
> module should also prove useful in other applications.
> However, eventually I think that jed ought to have iconv
> built-in if iconv solves the problem.
> Not all systems supported by jed have dynamic linking.
I agree, we should use iconv. As you say iconv may be useful also for other
applications (slrn comes to my mind), so why not add and iconv-like
interface to slang (both C api and interpreter)? At compile time, we can
choose between using an already installed iconv, or fallback to a dummy (or
simple hand written) version, useful if iconv is not installed or just
because of size concerns: iconv.dll is ~= 900K on windows.
>
> [...]
> >+ MAKE_INTRINSIC_S("utf8_decode", utf8_decode, SLANG_VOID_TYPE),
> >+ MAKE_INTRINSIC_0("utf8_encode", utf8_encode, SLANG_STRING_TYPE),
>
> With iconv, these are not necessary, right?
>
Yes, these where an alternative way, but I said, I prefer using iconv.
Thanks,
Dino
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2005 date index]
[2005 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]