On 17.01.06, Thei Wijnen wrote:
"Incosistent key definition". This happened in edt.sl at the
point where GOLD keys are being defined for special EDT functions.
I never had problems with this using JED on Windows.
The problem appeared to be in menus.sl in the section where
shortcuts are defined for the menubar. Since I do not use them
and doubt anyone does, and because I never saw problems in windows,
I disabled them using a conditional:
"#ifdef UNIX_do_we_need_this %?"
Could disabling (outcommenting) of enable_menu_keys() be an easier cure? At
least, if I start Jed with `xjed -n -e edt` I do not get an error here on
my Debian system with xjed B0.99.17-135 from the experimental sections xjed
package.
I have a request that concerns the handling of the GOLD key.
The numlock is really troublesome on linux and xterminals.
Therefore I chose the nearby Keypad_7 key to act as GOLD which
is much easier then the "far away" and "two hands" F1 key.
However when I execute the "show key" function, it will not
always return something link "GOLD a" runs the internal
function..., but "ESC O w a" runs the internal function...
You could try with the "hyper-" help mode from
http://jedmodes.sf.net/mode/hyperhelp/ which gives feedback on most defined
key variables (but fails with key-combinations involving Key_*).
On modern LAPTOP computers it is also hard to find a suitable
GOLD key because many laptops have different keyboards.
I see you already have defined key combinations as Key_Gold+Key_Num_PF2 etc.
What happens if you re-define Key_Gold to be any other keystring as e.g
Key_Gold = Key_F1;
or
Key_Gold = Key_Num_7; % Key_Gold = Key_KP_7; % in my notation
?
Günter
--
Milde ife.et.tu-dresden.de
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.