- Subject: suspend of XJed (was: How to detect when stdout is closed?)
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:51:47 +0000 (UTC)
Hello John,
"John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>BTW: What's your decision regarding the window popup problem for XJed?
>> It's not possible to bring XJed in forground, if it isn't active.
>> suspend() suspends the editor, if it hasn't the focus, but I want to
>> raise it as requested from another application.
>
> Would removing the "kill (0, SIGSTOP)" line in xterm.c be sufficient
> to deal with the issue?
If you implement the suspend somehow else, yes. I think dropping the
suspend functionality is not a good idea, because a suspend of XJed from
within an xterm is useful. IMO, you should add a function xjed_raise.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Gienger's Law (http://www.bruhaha.de/laws.html):
Die Wichtigkeit eines Newspostings im Usenet ist reziprok zur Anzahl der
enthaltenenen, kumulierten Ausrufungszeichen.
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2007 date index]
[2007 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]