- Subject: Patches for jed
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 19:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
Hi John,
I've some patches I would like to see included in your source tree.
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-jed/jed.git;a=commitdiff;h=7760b2b2a1437beac98ebe9f93dd813cbc5b611b
Split off the non‐binary part from the install
The Debian people prefer to install the non‐binary files with its own
rule to create different packages: one with the non‐binary files and
others with the binary files for each architecture.
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-jed/jed.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1558cb5d7b7e1cd4d8519976efb85453d6c1fc3
Remove dynamic linking checks and options
The dynamic linking stuff isn't used by Jed directly. The SLang library
does the work. The bad side of these dynamic linking stuff is that it
introduces an unnecessary dependency on libdl. It doesn't use anything
from libdl, but by linking to it it adds a dependency to the ELF header.
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-jed/jed.git;a=commitdiff;h=746c81ae56a120cd29133028fae1b7f07c9aaa49
Don't create JED_ROOT/bin, if it end up empty
If getmail is not built, the directory JED_ROOT/bin would be empty after
installation. This isn't nice.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473617
libgpm added the next broken support for terminals. You still have a
workaround for xterm. Not it hits rxvt. jed (liked with libgpm) hangs
on startup, because Gpm_Open() does some black magic.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Ein Mensch sieht ein und das ist wichtig,
nichts ist ganz flach und nichts ganz richtig.
(Eugen Roth)
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2008 date index]
[2008 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]