- Subject: Re: [Jed-users-l] [PATCH] save_buffer_to_file: Remove second question mark from prompt
- From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:33:33 +0100
On Di 18.Jan'11 at 2:07:25 +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> The function jed_get_yes_no() already adds a question mark to the end of
> the prompt.
So why not remove it?
---
src/ledit.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/ledit.c b/src/ledit.c
index 9a13d40..a742bbb 100644
--- a/src/ledit.c
+++ b/src/ledit.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ int jed_get_y_n (char *question)
int ans;
char *yn_quest;
- if (NULL == (yn_quest = strcat_malloc (question, "? (y/n)")))
+ if (NULL == (yn_quest = strcat_malloc (question, " (y/n)")))
return -1;
ans = jed_get_mini_response (yn_quest);
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ int find_file_cmd (char *filestr) /* filestr is const ! */ /*{{{*/
if (NULL != (buf = find_file_buffer (dirfile)))
{
if ((file_changed_on_disk (buf, dirfile) > 0)
- && (1 == jed_get_yes_no("File changed on disk. Read from disk")))
+ && (1 == jed_get_yes_no("File changed on disk. Read from disk?")))
{
int n = (int) buf->linenum;
mark_buffer_modified (buf, 0, 1);
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ int kill_buffer (void) /*{{{*/
Buffer *b = find_buffer(tmp);
if ((b != NULL) && (b->subprocess))
{
- if (0 == jed_get_yes_no("Buffer has a subprocess attached. Delete anyway"))
+ if (0 == jed_get_yes_no("Buffer has a subprocess attached. Delete anyway?"))
{
SLfree(tmp);
return 0;
--
1.7.2.2.119.gf9c33
_______________________________________________
Jed-users-l mailing list
Jed-users-l@xxxxxxxx
http://mailman.jtan.com/mailman/listinfo/jed-users-l
[2011 date index]
[2011 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]