jed-users mailing list

[2018 Date Index] [2018 Thread Index] [Other years]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]      [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [jed-users] XJed looks


You sir, made my day. Especially with the last part.


I've been battling VT100 compatibility for ages and the lack of people
who actually understand the standard is quite scary. I truly worry that
soon, only us few will be those left who have actually read and
understood the standards set forth years ago. And to think -- It truly
is not that hard of a standard and it works quite well.


I think standards compliance is a dying breed and we're one of the
casualties of it.


On 07/06/2018 08:20 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
>
> Knowing nothing but recognizing something I will offer up this fish.
> It might be a Red Herring and it might be The Big Kahuna.
>
> The VT100 mode of every free terminal on Linux isn't even close to
> VT100 compatible. You have to hack and override a vast number of
> definitions. Minor discussion here.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.os.vms/linux$20vt100$20emulation%7Csort:date/comp.os.vms/WTSEx6j7qTc/3GsFMSAMBgAJ
>
> Wee bit of rehash here:
>
> http://www.logikalsolutions.com/wordpress/information-technology/xterm-and-vt-emulation/
>
> Even more discussion here
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.os.vms/linux$20vt100$20emulation%7Csort:date/comp.os.vms/9DIFTtYLpn0/SOhgHPFXOAAJ
>
> My guess is, with a much older distro, your changes work fine, just
> like my xterm script worked fine for decades. Recently there has been
> yet another regression of VT100 support. My script stopped working if
> my login.com had
>
> $ SET TERM/INQ
>
> which means to inquire from the terminal what its settings should be
> and then tell the OS.
>
> Those backward question marks are a red flag. Seen them many times
> trying to use various terminals to communicate with VMS systems. I
> would suggest trying the VT102 stuff from the first discussion link.
> It may not be a final answer, but, it should make a big improvement.
>
> I will guess this VT100 regression happened the way most of them do.
> Someone bitched to the 12 year old "maintaining" the package that
> keystroke blah or terminal string yaha didn't let them use some
> feature of VIM they really wanted and both of them together knowing
> less-than-zero about either OpenVMS or a VT100, hacked it, took out
> whatever automated tests that failed, and checked it in.
>
>
> On 07/06/2018 12:46 AM, Chris wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've installed XJed and Jed and applied the CBrief patch to create a
>> pretty good Brief clone under Linux. Whilst I'm happy with the result,
>> Jed works very well, XJed however has an issue with the display of
>> menus. I'm assuming that it is something I need to fix, but what do I
>> need to fix/check? As I don't see problems elsewhere, it would be great
>> if I could apply a XJed specific fix, rather than fiddling with a system
>> setting, but if I have to, I will.
>>
>> System details: 32GB RAM, 64-bit laptop running Debian 10 / Buster /
>> Testing / next-stable. It has a hybrid video card, but right now it is
>> running Intel, as I ran into a couple of NVidia nasties.
>>
>> Screenshots of XJed and Jed attached.
>>
>> Rgds Chris
>>
>
> -- 
> Roland Hughes, President
> Logikal Solutions
> (630)-205-1593
>
> http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
> http://www.infiniteexposure.net
> http://www.johnsmith-book.com
> http://www.logikalblog.com
> http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
> http://lesedi.us/
> http://onedollarcontentstore.com


_______________________________________________
For list information, visit <http://jedsoft.org/jed/mailinglists.html>.


[2018 date index] [2018 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]      [Date Prev] [Date Next]