Re: [slang] latest spamming attacks

["John E. Davis" <davis>]

Oezguer Kesim <kesim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Till then, a workaround will hopefully prohibit spams.  Unfortunetly, this
>means, that your "Return-Path: " address must be the same as the address
>you are subscribed with, whenever you sent mail to the list.

I manually added a `Return-Path' header to this message.  However, I
did not see any such header in the several of the messages that I
looked at on this list.  Which mailers generate such a header?  Will
the header be required after the software upgrade?

Thanks,
--John