- Subject: Re: [slang-users] Strange COLORFGBG feature
- From: Nicolas Schodet <schodet+slang@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:55:45 +0100
* John E. Davis <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031111 05:12]:
> >Why do get_default_colors return -1 if it do not find COLORFGBG or
> >DEFAULT_COLOR ? Why not return 0 and fill fg_buf and bg_buf with a
> >"default" default value ?
> As far as I know, not all color terminals support the default color
> escape sequence (ESC[39m), and there is no guarantee that sending a
> terminal an escape sequence that it does not support will not have
> an undesirable side effect.
> [...]
In mutt, if COLORFGBG is not set, it has undesirable effect. Is it a bug
in mutt ?
Nicolas.
--
Microsoft est-il le Grand Satan ?
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/microsoft.fr.html
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit http://jedsoft.org/slang/mailinglists.html
[2003 date index]
[2003 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]