- Subject: Re: [slang-users] slcurses
- From: "John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:12:20 -0500
Alan Szlosek <alan.szlosek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>After installing s-lang I noticed an slcurses.h file in my include
>folder. It looks like the intention was to implement an s-lang version
>of the nCurses interface (functions, defines, etc). I tried linking
>-lslang and using the function in slcurses.h but had no luck.
The reason slcurses.h and slcurses.c exist is that it allowed me to
use a number of curses-based test programs during the development of
the SLsmg routines. It is not fully compatible with curses and as
such, I do not recommend the use of slcurses. Stick with the SLsmg
routines.
>Is this still a work in progress?
No, but it is still maintained.
>I'm interested because it's always nice to have alternatives. Are
>there any other viable alternatives to nCurses that you are aware of?
curses? pdcurses?
--John
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit http://jedsoft.org/slang/mailinglists.html
[2006 date index]
[2006 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]