Re: [slang-users] try does not run require

[Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hallo John,

"John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    variable i;
>    variable j = 0;
>    for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>      {
>          variable j;
>          for (j = 0; j < M; j++) ...
>      }

ACK. This is ugly. But if you specify that only global variables can be
overridden, because they are still accassable through Global->, than this
could not happen.

> and would be suprised to find that j is not 0 at the end of this code
> fragment.  For this reason, slang flags the duplicate declaration of j
> as an error.

Right, because in your example a variable within the same namespace is
redefined in an inner scope. But an error in this example:

if (...)
{
    variable i;
    ...
}

...

while (...)
{
    if (...)
    {
        variable i;
    }
}

is not really intuitive.

> But it only generates this error when the code occurs in a function.
> It does not do so for global variables, so that code such as

Which is IMO not really consistent.

Have a nice day, Jörg.
-- 
Roesen's Law (http://www.bruhaha.de/laws.html):
Sobald ein Troll, DAU oder Elch im Lauf eines Threads auf heftige Kritik
stößt, argumentiert er mit der Arroganz des Kritikers. Dies kann auch
vorsorglich erfolgen.

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit http://jedsoft.org/slang/mailinglists.html