- Subject: Re: gold key for edt mode
- From: "John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:50:43 -0500
Thei Wijnen <t.wijnen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On WindowsXP:
>
>1. jed.rc:
> () = evalfile("emacs"); % Emacs-like bindings
> setkey ("showkey", "^]"); % Ctrl-]
>% NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD = 0;
> () = evalfile("edt-john"); % EDT emulation
The default setting of NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD is 0, which means that when
using EDT emulation you do not intend to use the NumLock key as the
Gold key. Since no Gold_Key was specified, edt.sl will use the
default key, which is F1.
>Pressing ^] Numlock gives: Key "GOLD" runs the S-Lang function "edt_line".
I see what the problem is: the "application_keypad_mode" function in
edt.sl is setting NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD to a non-zero value. It should not
do this if NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD was set to 0 when edt.sl was loaded.
>So: Numlock send "\eOp" (lower case!) -> bound to edt_line
>I do not understand this... Certainly wrong.
No, it is sending "\eOP", but since "\eOP" has no binding, and "\eOp"
does, it uses it.
>3. jed.rc:
> () = evalfile("emacs"); % Emacs-like bindings
> setkey ("showkey", "^]"); % Ctrl-]
> NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD = 1;
> () = evalfile("edt-john"); % EDT emulation
>
>Pressing ^] Numlock TWICE gives: Key "GOLD GOLD" runs the S-Lang function
> "edt_togglekp".
>So: that is correct. So I do it and I see the message "GOLD OFF"
By running the edt_togglekp function, you have turned off the special
handling of the Numlock key. So pressing Numlock again will have no
effect.
>Doing it again has no effect (should have given "GOLD ON").
>So "edt_togglekp" does not work.
It does work, but the Numlock key has been deactivated.
>On a Putty terminal (or on TeraTerm) connected to a Linux host:
>I can not put some line with NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD in, because that
>variable is undefined. So I test:
NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD is a windows-specific jed feature. On other systems,
jed has no way to influence the NumLock key.
>4. jed.rc:
> () = evalfile("emacs"); % Emacs-like bindings
> setkey ("showkey", "^]"); % Ctrl-]
>% NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD = 0;
> () = evalfile("edt-john"); % EDT emulation
>
>Pressing ^] Numlock TWICE gives: Key "GOLD GOLD" runs the S-Lang function
> "edt_togglekp".
Your terminal must be set up to have the Numlock key send "\eOP".
>So: that is correct. So I do it and I see the message "GOLD OFF"
>Doing it again has no effect (should have given "GOLD ON").
>Same as above: "edt_togglekp" does not work.
It does work. On Unix and VMS, edt_togglekp sends an escape sequence
to the terminal to turn off application keypad mode. To turn it back
on, use M-x edt_togglekp.
>On a Putty terminal (or on TeraTerm) connected to a Linux host:
>
>5. jed.rc:
> () = evalfile("emacs"); % Emacs-like bindings
> setkey ("showkey", "^]"); % Ctrl-]
> variable Key_Gold = Key_F12;
> () = evalfile("edt-john.sl"); % EDT emulation
>
>Pressing ^] F12 TWICE gives: Key "ESC [ 2 4 ~ ESC [ 2 4 ~" runs the S-Lang
> function "edt_togglekp".
>So: that is correct. So I do it and I see the message "Numeric"
>Doing it again has the right effect, I see the message "Application"
>
>Pressing ^] Numlock gives Key "GOLD" runs the S-Lang function "edt_line".
>So: Numlock send "\eOp" (lower case!) -> bound to edt_line
>I do not understand this... Certainly wrong.
Again, I think the behavior is as expected: You specified the use of
a different Gold_Key (F12) and jed works with it as expected.
>So there are two kinds of problems:
>A. edt_togglekp can not be executed by the Numlock key. (windows&linux)
> So do not bind this function to Numlock.
As stated above, the bug is that edt_togglekp should not modify the
NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD key if edt.sl was loaded with NUMLOCK_IS_GOLD set to 0.
>B. The Numlock key starts to send something different (\eOp) once
> I define a different Key_Gold. That I do not understand.
(See the above explanation)
Thanks again for the testing and your detailed report.
--John
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
[2006 date index]
[2006 thread index]
[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] [Date Next]